Skip to content

Judge Strickland signs deadlines order in the Casey Anthony case

March 8, 2010

Judge Strickland signed an order today setting Casey Anthony’s trial date as May 9, 2011.   He also (wisely) set a timeline for all issues that need to be taken care of before then. This date is pushed back one week from the prosecutors suggested start date.  It also gives the defense more time to get their act together get everything done.  He gave their experts an extra month to review review evidence and depose witnesses.

Depositions of expert witnesses: deadline September 30, 2010.

Expert witnesses must be revealed, expert witness reports filed,  motions for forensic related evidence found filed: deadline November 30, 2010.

Evidence review by defense expert witnesses: deadline October 31, 2010.

read the entire order here:

15 Comments leave one →
  1. mikka permalink
    March 8, 2010 11:14 am

    itsamystery ,its time judge strickland make the decision,hope it puts a end on bozos stalling the trial!

  2. mikka permalink
    March 8, 2010 11:15 am

    number 6 penalty phase witnesses,love it! 😆

  3. March 8, 2010 12:25 pm

    thanks for the update, mystery. now, let the circus continue. lol

  4. itsamysterytome permalink*
    March 8, 2010 12:25 pm


    It is about time. HaHa! #6 just registered in my brain. Of course, that probably is stated in all such orders.

  5. itsamysterytome permalink*
    March 8, 2010 12:43 pm


    That about says it all. LOL

  6. Sanny permalink
    March 8, 2010 2:12 pm

    Judge Strickland has the patience of Jobe with the Defense.

    He is doing his level best to make certain that Casey and Co. have all their
    ducks lined up…..granting extra time (a month) to review and depose……ya think
    they’ll get it straight now?

    Or will there be more motions coming down the pike from D-fense???

    Good Lord, let’s hope not.

    I’m getting old just waiting for this circus to get started!!! and want to be around
    for the end.

  7. itsamysterytome permalink*
    March 8, 2010 3:16 pm


    I think the defense will stretch that rope til it breaks. My guess is that Strickland will have to address this all again in the future.

  8. March 8, 2010 4:22 pm

    Well maybe will all this time before trial, Zanny will finally be found and Casey will be proven innocent…….just like Jose said. 🙂 Ha ha ha ha

    Thanks *Mystery.

  9. itsamysterytome permalink*
    March 8, 2010 6:35 pm

    ha ha ha is right!

  10. susan permalink
    March 8, 2010 6:41 pm

    new motion!

  11. mikka permalink
    March 8, 2010 8:19 pm

    chanel 13

    In a new motion the defense writes “the media has used multiple photos in order to vilify her as a ‘party girl’ who must be responsible for her daughter’s death.”

    There’s also a list of statements submitted by the defense that they want no mention of at Anthony’s trial.

    Some of those statements include the infamous 911 call when Cindy Anthony said “it smelled like a dead body in the car.”

    Or when George Anthony said to a tow truck worker “the daughter is telling us crap, a bunch of lies.”

    It also includes statements Roy Kronk made to former deputy Richard Cain.

    Her team said it’s unfair to the case, and a jury should never hear about it.

    The defense wants it all tossed out on the basis that its hearsay evidence

  12. itsamysterytome permalink*
    March 8, 2010 8:41 pm

    Thanks for the link Susan, and update Mikka. I just posted on it!

  13. Molly permalink
    March 8, 2010 11:03 pm

    Well, pictures speak a thousand words don’t they. sorry baez, thank your “girl” for that!
    the pics taken during the 31 day period are pretty damning anyway.

  14. Molly permalink
    March 8, 2010 11:05 pm

    They will NEVER throw out that 911 call made by cindy, because it was made by cindy & not by casey (who it should have been). that’s part of this whole story.

  15. itsamysterytome permalink*
    March 9, 2010 1:07 pm


    I tend to agree with you about the 911 calls and the pictures taken during that 31 days. Spacely made a good argument under the most current post for why her actions even before then are relevant. If the prosecution plans to go with pre-meditated murder they would need to show that her actions prior to Caylee’s disappearance show she was planning to kill her.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: