Casey Anthony’s defense to question Roy Kronk
Today defense attorneys are scheduled to question Roy Kronk, the meter reader who found Caylee Anthony’s remains. Casey Anthony’s attorneys have previously suggested that Kronk could have been the one responsible for the disappearance and murder of her daughter, Caylee.
There has been no evidence provided in support of this claim to date. HOWEVER, there are, apparently, some weird coincidences surrounding Kronk and his “discovery”. Kronk seems to have a penchant for searching wooded areas. Could this unfortunate habit help the defense destroy his credibility?
An incident that occurred in 1997 has been uncovered. Kronk called authorities in Kingsport, Tennessee to tell them they would find several stolen guns and other stolen items he had stumbled upon in a wooded field. According to the police report, LE searched the area but nothing was found. Fast forward to 2008, 11 years later, and we have his repeated calls to LE that eventually led to the discovery of Caylee’s remains, also in a wooded area. Just a coincidence?
- An event that might seem to have been arranged although it was really accidental.
- When two things happen at the same time, at the same place, or to the same people that seems surprinsing or unusual.
While I would agree that Kronk’s behavior could and should be filed under the heading, “Odd Habits”, (Heck, I’d even give it a prominent position on my top 1o “It’s A Mystery To Me!” list), I DON’T agree that it proves anything–not even reasonable doubt. Kronk may well be, as has been suggested by people that knew him, a person that looks for ways to make himself out to become a “hero” of sorts in the eyes of a family and world that sees him as something far less. (Pathetic, but not a crime) Or, he could simply get his jollies from taking crimes from the headlines, searching for, and solving them. A treasure hunter so to speak. (Creepy but not a crime.) Who knows, and who really cares? He found a little girl that needed to be found. If much more time had gone by without her remains being recovered , there’s a really good chance nature would have made sure she was lost forever.
So where is the physical or even suggested evidence that could logically connect Kronk to Casey Anthony? The defense would have to prove that a connection + a motive for killing an innocent 2 year old existed in order to show that Roy Kronk had access to a live Caylee AND access to Casey’s car trunk. Beyond THAT, they would have to convince a jury that Casey could have realistically driven around for days “searching for her daughter”, oblivious to the smell emitting from her trunk until Kronk found a way to get rid of the “evidence”.
Local 6 called Kronk’s attorney for a response to allegations against him. He said there is no need for a response, calling this, “One of the many sideshows in this case.” Kronk’s attorney asaid his client has nothing to hide and points out that he is not the one on trial.
read it below: